Lompat ke konten Lompat ke sidebar Lompat ke footer

Widget HTML #1

Alaska Class Cruiser Vs Scharnhorst

The cruiser Ill be using is USS Baltimore and Battleship would be the planned Montana class. Planning for ships that eventually evolved into the Alaska class began in the late 1930s after the deployment of Germanys Scharnhorst-class battleships and rumors that Japan was constructing a new battlecruiser class.


Uss Augusta Ca 31 Originally Cl 31 Was A Northampton Class Heavy Cruiser Of The United States Navy Notable For Serv Us Navy Ships Heavy Cruiser Navy Ships

So either as a battlecruiser cruiser killer or as a Battlecruiser for fleet actions the.

Alaska class cruiser vs scharnhorst. Same as 2 but at night. Both ships are at their peak on a clear calm day visibility up to 20miles. The armour scheme for her time was quite advanced and compared to the British Nelson class more heavily armoured per of tonnage.

An Alaska-class large cruisers 12-inch. Theyre not well armed enough to serve as a central part of the battleline as ships like Hood Repulse or Kongo did. The Alaska Class were not needed with so many fast Carriers available and so few Japanese Heavy Cruisers at sea.

Perhaps greater efforts made for speedy completion in the previous year. Line drawing of Alaska in 1945. The Alaska class Cruiser was cheaper than an Iowa class battleship.

In March she was with TG584 for further raids against the Japanese mainland concentrating on. Well the KM Scharnhorst class including Gneisau and the USS Alaska class inlcuding the USS Guam were similar. By comparison the Alaskas were 808 feet-long and weighed 29771 tons.

Friends of Padre Steves World The three ships of the Alaska Class were among the most confusing and curious designs of warships ever built for the US NavyThey had their genus in the early 1930s when the Germans deployed the Deutschland Class Pocket Battleships which in reality were heavy cruisers with 11 guns designed for long range commerce. Joined the Pacific Fleet at Pearl Harbor on 13 January 1945 and between 15 February and 12 March was in action off Iwo Jima and covering raids against Tokyo and Yokohama with TG583. According to Fleets of World War II the Alaska-class cruisers were armed with nine 12-inch guns and 12 five-inch dual-purpose guns.

By comparison the Long Lance torpedo had a maximum range of 32800 yards. To serve as cruiser-killers capable of seeking out and destroying these post-treaty heavy cruisers the class was given large guns of a new and expensive design limited armor. These ships are pretty evenly matched.

Designed as a counter to the German Scharnhorst and Gneisenau which in 1939 and 1940 had created havoc in the Atlantic raiding convoys and sinking the Royal Navy Aircraft Carrier. Alaska represents the Heavy Heavy Cruiser class a doing to size up up armor and up gun heavy cruisers. The Scharnhorst even was a battleship not a cruiser so the suggested 37429 ton ship of your scenario will get its own share of incapacitation and be mission killed anyway.

The German ships were classed as Battleships carrying 9-11 guns some would classify them as Battlecruisers smaller than a battleship and the Alaska was classed as a Large cruiser and had 912 guns. The Alaska class was a class of six large cruisers ordered before World War II for the United States NavyThey were officially classed as large cruisers CB but others have regarded them as battlecruisersThey were all named after territories or insular areas of the United States signifying their intermediate status between larger. They were armed with 9 12 guns 12 5 guns 56 40mm guns and 34 20mm guns.

However if youd shown them to Jacky Fisher hed. Line drawing of Alaska in 1945. Standard American heavy cruiser design like the 673 feet-long 14500-ton Baltimore-class were armed with 9 8 guns 12 5 guns and 24 20mm guns.

So how do the Alaska-class fit into this. The three ships of the Alaska Class though classed as Large Cruisers by the US Navy were actually the last Battle Cruisers designed built and put into operation by any Navy. They are also referred to as the Gneisenau class in some other sources as Gneisenau.

Alaskas immune zone against Scharnhorst stretches from roughly 22000 to 32000 yards. The German ships were classed as Battleships carrying 9-11 guns some would classify them as Battlecruisers smaller than a battleship and the Alaska was classed as a. Alaska vs Scharnhorst would have been equally bad for a light cruiser but interesting for each other- Scharnhorst had a much thicker main belt and a battleship underwater protection scheme.

Scharnhorst is a for her time rather advanced battleship that only suffers from sub-caliber guns in direct conflict with other battleships. Same day time conditions. Alaska was designed as an anti commerce raider and AA support ship designed to counter light cruisers heavy cruisers Germanys Deutschland class armoured cruisers and the rumoured Japanese B65 large cruiser class.

Same as 1 but at night. The Alaska class was a class of six large cruisers ordered before World War II for the United States NavyThey were officially classed as large cruisers CB but. Well the KM Scharnhorst class including Gneisau and the USS Alaska class inlcuding the USS Guam were similar.

It is the number of ordonance thrown at the target that makes the difference not the weight alone. In between would be-Alaska-Hood-the proposed Amagi class. Plus the US had no merchant marine to protect.

The Alaska class is a giant cruiser with larger than average guns Seriously upscaled Balitmore with 12 rifles. They somewhat fill the last definition but are somewhat underarmoured compared to the Scharnhorsts. Both ships have for whatever reason lost radar and must rely on manual range finders to target.

Thats assuming a shell doesnt slip over the belt and hit the boiler hump as happened at North Cape. The Alaskas were the US Navys answer to these potential foes. Scharnhorsts immune zone against Alaska stretches from roughly 16000 to 24000 yards.

Alaska and Guam are generally referred to as Large Heavy Cruisers although some suggest the basic specification of their design places them firmly in the battlecruiser category. The Scharnhorst class was a class of German battleships or battlecruisers built immediately prior to World War IIThe first capital ships of Nazi Germanys Kriegsmarine it comprised two vessels. Scharnhorst was launched first and is considered to be the lead ship by some sources.

Scharnhorst and Gneisenau are variously referred to as small battleships or battlecruisers. They definitely dont fit the definition of battlecruiser used by the contemporary RN and IJN. Hood Amagi represent what a battlecruiser is.

USS Alaska Heavy Cruiser from WWII Vs.


Uss Bb 67 Montana Stillborn Battleship Battleship Warship Model Us Navy Ships


Sovetsky Soyuz Class Battleship Ideas For The Tech Tree And New Ships Battleship Warship Black Sea Fleet


Schematic Of The Battleship Gneisenau Battleship Us Navy Ships Warship


Pin On Navy Pins


Uss Alaska Cb 1 Ordered 9 September 1940 Builder New York Shipbuilding Co Laid Down 17 December 1941 Launched 15 Naval History Battleship Navy Ships


Dkm Karlsruhe Konigsberg Class Light Cruiser Kriegsmarine Erster Weltkrieg Schiff


Uss Guam Cb 2 Us Navy Ships Battleship Warship


The Never Were Alaska From A Forgotten Age By Tzoli On Deviantart Battleship New Battleship Model Ships


Pin By Ermi Piaz On Battleship Battleship Navy Ships Navy Coast Guard


Usn Model Warships 1 350 Large Cruiser The Alaska Class Top Bottom Heavy Cruiser Maybe The Portland Class And Two In 2021 Model Warships Warship Model Model Ships


Pin On Donnerkeil


Free Version Of Scharnhorst In The Android Game Warship Battle By Joycity Warship Battle Warship Hms Hood


Battleship Hms Prince Of Wales Lowering A Supermarine Walrus Amphibian Aircraft Over Her Side Early 1941 Battleship Warship Royal Navy


Pin On Royal Navy


Posting Komentar untuk "Alaska Class Cruiser Vs Scharnhorst"

https://www.highrevenuegate.com/zphvebbzh?key=b3be47ef4c8f10836b76435c09e7184f